4.7 Article

Antimony speciation and potential ecological risk of metal(loid)s in plain wetlands in the lower Yangtze River valley, China

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 1114-1121

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.164

关键词

Antimony; Bioavailability; Surficial sediment; Potential ecological risk; Plain wetlands

资金

  1. National Water Pollution Control and Management Technology Major Projects of China [2017ZX07206]
  2. Edanz Group China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing attention is being paid to Sb as a primary hazardous substance, and further systematic studies of Sb behavior in freshwater wetlands are required. The plain wetlands in Lake Taihu basin located in lower Yangtze River valley, are heavily populated and economically developed area in China. The plain wetlands receive polluted water from point sources (textile and printing plants). In this study, Sb speciation in plain wetlands was investigated and the potential ecological risk of 8 metal(loid)s (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, Sb) were assessed. The mean Sb concentration in the wetlands water is 7.03 mu g L-1, which consist of pentavalent, trivalent, organic Sb dissolved in water and a great part that attached to suspend solids (SS). Statistical analysis indicated that Sb(III) is dissolved from SS and then further oxided to Sb(V) accompanied with tailing water discharged into wetlands; presence of organic Sb is related to microorganic in eutrophic environment; precipitation of SS is the dominant factor for distribution of bioavailable Sb in surficial sediment. The toxicity coefficient factor for Sb is proposed as 10 and ambient background of 8 metal(loid)s are set up. The potential ecological risk for plain wetlands was 135, which was low level. As, Cd and Sb were main contributors to the ecological risks. The wetlands are threatened by Sb pollution, which should be restrict by reducing the concentration of SS and Sb in tailing water from local water treatment facilities. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据