4.7 Article

Influence of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock on carbon fractions of biochar produced from pyrolysis of rice straw, pine wood, pig manure and sewage sludge

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 624-631

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.177

关键词

Biochar; Carbon stability; Dissolved carbon fraction; UV-Visible absorption

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [41473104, 41673117, 41390240]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M633070]
  3. Special Basic Research Fund for Central Public Research Institutes [PM-zx703-201803-083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the influences of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on carbon fractions of biochar were investigated. Four types of organic wastes (rice straw (RS), pine wood (PW), pig manure (PM) and sewage sludge (SS)) were pyrolyzed at different temperatures (300 degrees C, 400 degrees C, 500 degrees C, 600 degrees C and 700 degrees C). Biochar produced at low temperature exhibited high yields, high dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content and unstable organic carbon content. In contrast, biochar formed at high temperature showed high C content and C stability with a low O/C and H/C ratios. In addition, the biochar pyrolyzed from PW contained the lowest DOC of the four biochar types. The properties of DOC fractions (F1, F2 and F3) released from biochar differed depending on feedstock, pyrolysis temperatures, and extraction procedures. The highest specific ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm of the F1 and F2 fractions were observed for RS biochar, suggesting that more aromatic organic matter was present in sequentially extracted fractions of RS biochar than in extracts from the other biochars. In addition, the hot water extracts (F2) mostly showed higher aromaticity than cold water extracts (F1). The stability of biochars was greatly enhanced at pyrolysis temperatures >500 degrees C. If the biochars produced in this study were to be used for carbon sequestration in soil, the first priority should be PW, followed in order by RS and PM. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据