4.7 Article

Changes in the pattern of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil treated with biochar from a multiyear field experiment

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 662-670

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.178

关键词

Biochar; Polyaromatic; Soil; Persistence; PAH diagnostic ratios

资金

  1. Italian Biochar Association (ICHAR)
  2. Italian Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca
  3. University di Bologna Alma Mater Studiorum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of biochar added to an agricultural soil on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) levels, PAH diagnostic ratios and soil properties was investigated in a five-year field experiment. The experiment was carried out in an Italian vineyard and included two biochar treatments: 16.5 t ha(-1) of biochar applied in 2009 (soil B); 16.5 t ha(-1) in 2009 and further 16.5 t ha(-1) in 2010 (soil BB). A set of 75 samples that included five replicates and a control soil (untreated) was characterized in terms of organic carbon, pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), bulk density and concentration of PAHs. Biochar addition to soil caused an increase in organic carbon, pH and CEC, and a decrease of bulk density. After almost two years the first application of biochar, PAH concentrations were higher in soil B (56 ng g(-1)) and BB (153 ng g(-1)) in comparison to control soil (24 ng g(-1)). Thereafter, PAH concentrations decreased significantly, but the original PAHs levels were reached only in soil B after five years. The naphthalene/(naphthalene + phenanthrene) ratios were higher in the treated soils in accordance to the dominance of naphthalene in the original biochar. The cross plots naphthalene/(naphthalene + phenanthrene) vs. fluoranthene/(fluoranthene + pyrene) enabled to trace the signature of biochar PAHs up to five years after its first application. Diagnostic ratios can be a useful tool to study the persistence of PAHs introduced in soil by biochar when the pattern of these contaminants in biochar and original soil are different. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据