4.7 Article

Study on neurotoxicity of dinotefuran, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid against Chinese lizards (Eremias argus)

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 150-157

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.016

关键词

Eremias argus; Neonicotinoids; Neurotoxicity; Metabolite

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477152, 41807478]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neurotoxicity of dinotefuran, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid against Chinese lizards (Eremias argus) were evaluated in acute oral exposure and 28d subchronic exposure. Dinotefuran was not easily metabolized and showed strong persistence in the lizard brain. Thiamethoxam and imidacloprid were rapidly absorbed and excreted in lizards, and were not easily enriched in the lizard brain. Dinotefuran and thiamethoxam could directly increase the concentrations of acetylcholine in the brain and blood by up-regulating the expression of the ach gene, which in turn enhanced the binding of acetylcholine and acetylcholinesterase receptors, eventually causing the release of dopamine. The effect of dinotefuran was more pronounced than thiamethoxam. Clothianidin was a major metabolite of thiamethoxam in the brain and aggravated the neurotoxic effects of thiamethoxam. Imidacloprid desnitro olefin was the only metabolite of imidacloprid that enriched in the brain. The protonation effect of imidacloprid desnitro olefin was stronger than that of the parent imidacloprid, which increased its binding ability to lizard acetylcholinesterase receptors. Competitive inhibition of imidacloprid desnitro olefin and acetylcholine led to the down-regulation of ach gene expression. Although neonicotinoids caused the opening of ligand-gated ion channel through the activation of acetylcholinesterase receptors, the body would alleviate these effects by the inhibition of voltage-dependent channel activity for compensatory mechanisms. This study provided a new perspective on the neotoxic effects of neonicotinoids. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据