4.3 Article

Omega-3 index in the Czech Republic: No difference between urban and rural populations

期刊

CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS OF LIPIDS
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 23-27

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2019.02.006

关键词

Omega-3 index; Red blood cells; Nationwide survey

资金

  1. Czech Academy of Sciences, project QUALITAS - Wellbeing in health and disease, Strategy of Czech Academy of Sciences AV21: Top research in the public interest
  2. Czech Science Foundation [17-10088Y)]
  3. project BIOCEV - Biotechnology and Biomedicine Centre of the Academy of Sciences and Charles University from the European Regional Development Fund [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109]
  4. project implementation: The equipment for metabolomic and cell analyses - Research and Development for Innovations Operational Programme (RDIOP) - European regional development fund [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/19.0400]
  5. state budget of the Czech Republic
  6. Charles University [SVV 260440]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naturally occurring long-chain omega-3 PUFA such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5 omega-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6 omega-3) exert multiple effects on health, which are related to the intake of these lipids in the diet and correlate with the levels of omega-3 PUFA in the body. These levels are reflected by the omega-3 PUFA index, i.e. the EPA and DHA content as % of all fatty acids in red blood cells. The aim of this study was to evaluate omega-3 index in the Czech Republic, using blood samples collected from the capital city (n = 476) and the rural region (n = 388). The mean omega-3 index was 3.56 mol % with a maximal value of 8.10% and a minimal value of 1.12%. There was no difference in the index value between rural and urban / industrial regions, but this value was higher in subjects who reported eating fish or omega-3 PUFA supplements. In conclusion, the results indicated suboptimal values of the omega-3 index in the Czech population independent of the sampling region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据