4.6 Article

Collaborative Interferon-γ and Interleukin-17 Signaling Protects the Oral Mucosa from Staphylococcus aureus

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 186, 期 9, 页码 2337-2352

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.07.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIB National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL118183, R01HL113008]
  2. Gilead Sciences Research Scholars program
  3. American Autoimmune-Related Diseases Association
  4. American Heart Association [15PRE25400010]
  5. Richard J. and Margaret Conn Himelfarb Student Support Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infections with Staphylococcus aureus are a continuing and growing problem in community and hospital settings. Preclinical animal modeling of S. aureus relies on experimental infection, which carries some Limitations. We describe here a novel, spontaneous model of oral staphylococcal infection in double knockout mice, deficient in the receptors for IL-17 (IL-17RA) and interferon (IFN)-gamma (IFN gamma RI), beginning at 6 to 8 weeks of age. IFN gamma RI-/- IL17RA(-/-) (GRAKO) mice developed progressive oral abscesses. Cytometric methods revealed extensive neutrophilic infiltration of oral tissues in GRAKO mice; further investigation evidenced that IL-17 predominated neutrophil defects in these mice. To investigate the contribution of IFN-gamma signaling to this native host defense to S. aureus, we observed perturbations of monocyte recruitment and macrophage differentiation in the oral tissues of GRAKO mice, and CXCL9/chemokine ligand receptor (CXCR)3-driven recruitment of T-cell oral tissues and draining lymph nodes. To address the former finding, we depleted macrophages and monocytes in vivo from IL17RA(-/-) mice using liposomes Loaded with clodronate. This treatment elicited oral abscesses, recapitulating the phenotype of GRAKO mice. From these findings, we propose novel collaborative functions of IL-17 and IFN-gamma, acting through neutrophils and macrophages, respectively, in native mucocutaneous host defenses to S. aureus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据