4.7 Article

Enhanced chemical looping hydrogen production based on biomass ash-promoted iron ore oxygen carrier

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 360, 期 -, 页码 260-270

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.226

关键词

Chemical looping hydrogen production; Biomass ash; Iron ore; Oxygen carrier

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576047, 51476029]
  2. Science Foundation of Nanjing Institute of Technology [YKJ201608]
  3. Practical Innovation Training Program for College Students in Jiangsu Province [201811276061X]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical looping hydrogen production using natural iron ore has attracted extensive attention. However, the greatest challenge is the relatively low deep-reduction rate of iron ore, significantly affecting H-2 production. A new biomass ash-modified iron ore has been developed to enhance the deep reduction of oxygen carrier and hydrogen production. Chemical looping hydrogen production is experimentally carried out in a fluidized bed using CO as fuel. The effect of several parameters is evaluated, including ash type, ash content, reaction temperature and cycle number. Results indicate that the performance of the modified iron ore primarily depends on ash type. The Si-rich rice stalk ash causes serious particle sintering, resulting in reactivity deterioration of oxygen carrier. Contrarily, new formations of K-Fe-O compound enhance the deep reduction of other ash-decorated oxygen carriers increasing H-2 yield. Nevertheless, the co-existing negative effect of ash on oxygen carrier reduction and H-2 production also appears when the content of rape stalk ash and wheat stalk ash exceeds 10%. The 15% sunflower ash-decorated iron ore exhibits a relatively superior performance, and the elevated temperature promotes H-2 yield and H-2 purity reaches the maximum 99.57% at 900 degrees C. The selected 15% sunflower ash-decorated iron ore exhibits a stable performance for promoting H-2 production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据