4.7 Article

Application of aquaporin-based forward osmosis membranes for processing of digestate liquid fractions

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 371, 期 -, 页码 583-592

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.029

关键词

Forward osmosis; Digestate liquid fraction; Hide preservation wastewater; Total ammonia-nitrogen rejection (TAN); Membrane rinsing; Membrane fouling

资金

  1. Depuracion de Aguas del Mediterraneo (DAM, Spain)
  2. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/under REA grant [289887]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forward osmosis is a low-energy water treatment emerging technology, which has demonstrated improved solute rejection and low fouling propensity. In this study, the applicability of aquaporin-based forward osmosis membranes during separation of biogas digestate liquid fractions was investigated. The results showed that Total Ammonia-Nitrogen rejection was higher than 95.5% in all experiments, independently of the type of draw solution (NaCl and hide preservation effluents), experimental period and the use of feed acidification. The results also confirmed that high draw osmotic pressures (i.e. 3.5 M sodium chloride and hide preservation wastewater) combined with feed acidification had a negative effect on the membrane water permeability. Membrane rinsing after fouling was also successful in recovering the membrane initial water flux as well as removing the remaining foulants on the membrane surface. The membrane inspection results from Scanning-Electron Microscope, Energy-Dispersive X-Ray analysis and Fourier Transform Infrared-Attenuated Total Reflectance showed that fouling in this application was mild and reversible after membrane rinsing. The applicability of aquaporin-based forward osmosis membranes during separation of biogas digestate liquid fractions has been demonstrated. The results showed the potential of this technology to achieve enhanced ammonia-nitrogen rejections and lowfouling propensity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据