4.7 Article

Removal of pharmaceuticals, toxicity and natural fluorescence through the ozonation of biologically-treated hospital wastewater, with further polishing via a suspended biofilm

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 359, 期 -, 页码 321-330

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.112

关键词

Hospital wastewater; Ozonation; Toxicity; Fluorescence; Pharmaceuticals

资金

  1. MERMISS project (Miljoeffektiv rensning af hojpotente laegemiddelstoffer i hospitals-spildevand/Environmentally effective removal of pharmaceuticals from hospital wastewater) from the MUDP program, Danish Ministry of the Environment, Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, a pilot-scale ozonation system was introduced as post treatment to reduce the pharmaceuticals and toxicity in the effluent of a pilot-scale Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor ( MBBR) treating hospital wastewater. The ozonated effluent was polished further by suspended biofilm carriers to remove biodegradable organic matter and toxicity generated from ozonation by-products. A laboratory ozonation system was used to mimic the experiments, which were carried out at the pilot plant so that the removal of pharmaceuticals in the pilot and laboratory experiments could be compared. Delivered ozone dose achieved 90% removal of pharmaceutical was obtained and it was normalised to dissolved organic carbon (DOC). These normalised results show that trimethoprim was eliminated by ozone easier than other pharmaceuticals. Fluorescence was found to be highly correlated to the removal of pharmaceuticals, and fluorescence with a wavelength of 275 nm of excitation and 310 nm of emission had the closest correlation. After polishing MBBR was introduced into the ozonated wastewater, half of its protein-like fluorophore was removed. The toxicity of the hospital wastewater during MBBR treatment was measured by Vibrio fischeri, the inhibition of which decreased from 80% to 50%. By applying ozonation, this inhibition reduced to 20%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据