4.7 Article

Li-LSX-zeolite evaluation for post-combustion CO2 capture

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 358, 期 -, 页码 1351-1362

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.063

关键词

Carbon capture and storage; CO2 solid adsorbent; Zeolite; Li-LSX-zeolite

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/P018955/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/P018955/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium low silica X type (Li-LSX) zeolite is typically used for industrial N-2/O-2 separation processes, but its potential as a carbon dioxide capture sorbent has not been fully evaluated yet. In this work, Li-LSX zeolite was investigated as CO2 sorbent under post- combustion conditions in TGA and Fixed-bed configurations. The maximum adsorption capacity and CO2/N-2 selectivity were determined to be 4.43 mmol g(-1) and 85.7 at 60 degrees C and in presence of 14% CO2, using a packed bed configuration. The CO2 and N-2 adsorption capacity was decreased of 10 mol% when the initial calcination temperature was raised from 60 to 300 degrees C due to a decreased micropore surface. However, the high calcination temperature increased the CO2 selectivity to 128.1 and increased the adsorption rates due to enhanced basicity (1 order of magnitude) and external surface ( + 75 to 80%) in the Li-LSX zeolite. The sorption stability at 60 degrees C was found to be excellent during 85 sorption cycles over 35 h period with LiLSX showing negligible difference in adsorption capacity throughout the cycles and a working capacity of 2.45 mmolCO(2)/g after an initial calcination at 550 degrees C (2 min) and cyclic adsorption at 60 degrees C (6 min) and desorption at 420 degrees C (5 min). The Avrami kinetic model shows the coexistence of different adsorption mechanisms. CO2 adsorption rate increased with the increasing CO2 partial pressure, as a result of the facilitated CO2 diffusion processes. Film diffusion was determined as the rate-limiting step for CO2 adsorption. Therefore, based on these findings, Li-LSX represents a promising sorbent for post-combustion carbon capture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据