4.6 Article

Major Action of Endogenous Lysyl Oxidase in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Progression and Collagen Stiffness Revealed by Primary Cell Cultures

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 186, 期 9, 页码 2473-2485

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.05.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. grant PRIN [61903_004, 69373_004]
  2. Fondo d'Ateneo per la Ricerca Milano-Bicocca University [6152]
  3. Associazione Gianluca Strada Onlus [7920101001]
  4. grant FIRB [RBRN07BMCT]
  5. Milano-Bicocca University
  6. Regione Lombardia-Fondazione Cariplo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is therapy resistant; therefore, it is worthwhile studying in depth the molecular aspects of its progression. In ccRCC the biallelic inactivation of the VHL gene Leads to stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). Among the targets of HIF-1 alpha transcriptional activity is the LOX gene, which codes for the inactive proenzyme (Pro-Lox) from which, after extra cellular secretion and proteolysis, derives the active enzyme (Lox) and the propeptide (Lox-PP). By increasing stiffness of extracellular matrix by collagen crosslinking, Lox promotes tumor progression and metastasis. Lox and Lox-PP can reenter the cells where Lox promotes cell proliferation and invasion, whereas Lox-PP acts as tumor suppressor because of its Ras recision and apoptotic activity. Few data are available concerning LOX in ccRCC. Using an in vitro model of ccRCC primary cell cultures, we performed, for the first time in ccRCC, a detailed study of endogenous LOX and also investigated their transcriptomic profile. We found that endogenous LOX is overexpressed in ccRCC, is involved in a positive-regulative loop with HIF-1 alpha and has a major action on ccRCC progression through cellular adhesion, migration, and collagen matrix stiffness increment; however, the oncosuppressive action of Lox-PP was not found to prevail. These findings may suggest translational approaches for new therapeutic strategies in ccRCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据