4.6 Article

Dlx1/2 are Central and Essential Components in the Transcriptional Code for Generating Olfactory Bulb Interneurons

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 4831-4849

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz018

关键词

Ascl1; Pax6; Dlx1; Dlx2; Gsx2; interneuron; olfactory bulb; Sp8; Sp9

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0108000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 31820103006, 31630032, 31425011, 31429002]
  3. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH094589, R37MH049428]
  4. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01NS089777]
  5. [NSFC 31700889]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Generation of olfactory bulb (OB) interneurons requires neural stem/progenitor cell specification, proliferation, differentiation, and young interneuron migration and maturation. Here, we show that the homeobox transcription factors Dlx1/2 are central and essential components in the transcriptional code for generating OB interneurons. In Dlx1/2 constitutive null mutants, the differentiation of GSX2(+) and ASCL1(+) neural stem/progenitor cells in the dorsal lateral ganglionic eminence is blocked, resulting in a failure of OB interneuron generation. In Dlx1/2 conditional mutants (hGFAP-Cre; Dlx1/2(F/-) mice), GSX2(+) and ASCL1(+) neural stem/progenitor cells in the postnatal subventricular zone also fail to differentiate into OB interneurons. In contrast, overexpression of Dlx1&2 in embryonic mouse cortex led to ectopic production of OB-like interneurons that expressed Gad1, Sp8, Sp9, Arx, Pbx3, Etv1, Tshz1, and Prokr2. Pax6 mutants generate cortical ectopia with OB-like interneurons, but do not do so in compound Pax6; Dlx1/2 mutants. We propose that DLX1/2 promote OB interneuron development mainly through activating the expression of Sp8/9, which further promote Tshz1 and Prokr2 expression. Based on this study, in combination with earlier ones, we propose a transcriptional network for the process of OB interneuron development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据