4.7 Article

Grinding characteristics and removal mechanisms of unidirectional carbon fibre reinforced silicon carbide ceramic matrix composites

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 3059-3071

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.178

关键词

Unidirectional silicon carbide ceramic matrix composites; Grinding forces; Surface topography; Surface roughness

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775100]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [170304022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The grinding performance of unidirectional carbon fibre reinforced silicon carbide ceramic matrix composites (C-f/SiC) was investigated in this paper. The effects of the fibre orientation and grinding depth on the surface integrity and grinding forces and an understanding of the grinding mechanisms are the primary concerns of this article. This problem is relatively unexplored; therefore, the main value of this research is to improve the processing quality and reduce the production cost. In the C-f/SiC grinding procedure, cracks, fibre wear, interfacial debonding, fibre pull-out and outcrop can be detected on the ground surface. The grinding depth and deflection angle have been shown to have a notable influence on the surface quality in different datum planes. A suitable grinding depth and deflection angle should be carefully chosen to achieve good surface quality in different machined surfaces. Specifically, the surface quality decreases and the grinding forces increase with increasing grinding depth. In addition, greater grinding surface quality is observed at beta = 90 degrees, i.e., gamma = 0 degrees, but poorer machined surfaces are obtained at alpha = 0 degrees, i.e., gamma = 90 degrees. The surface topography, roughness and grinding forces of unidirectional C-f/SiC could be forecasted according to the analysis conclusions. This research is expected to offer guidelines for increasing the machining quality of C-f/SiC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据