4.7 Article

Pore structure of affected zone around saturated and large superabsorbent polymers in cement paste

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 54-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.020

关键词

Pore structure; Affected zone; Cement matrix; Superabsorbent polymer; Internal curing

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0310001]
  2. Technology Innovation Special Program of Hubei Province [2018AAA002]
  3. Doctoral Scientific Research foundation of Hubei University of Technology [BSQD2017037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superabsorbent polymer (SAP) has been widely used as internal curing agent for cement-based materials, duo to its high internal curing efficiency. Pore structure of affected zone around SAP is important for understanding the internal curing mechanism. This paper presents a study of the pore structure evolution of affected zone around SAP in cement paste with water/cement ratio 0.24 and 0.30 from 3 up to 28 days. Pore structure of affected zone and matrix was tested by mercury intrusion porosimetry and nitrogen adsorption and desorption. Surface fractal dimensions were determined using two different fractal models. Results indicated that SAP had no effect on the pore shape of affected zone, excluding the pore volume and pore diameter at early and late ages. Higher critical pore diameter but lower pore volume were found in affected zone at late ages. All the samples showed a multi-fractal property at micro- and macro-fractal scale, and the surface fractal dimension of affected zone was always larger than the matrix, showing a higher pore complexity. Some new findings on internal curing were achieved from an affected zone perspective. The calculated mechanical strength and permeability of affected zone from the pore structure parameters were found higher than the matrix. These new findings may give insight into the effect of internal curing with SAP from the perspective of affected zone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据