4.8 Article

Unexpected Receptor Functional Mimicry Elucidates Activation of Coronavirus Fusion

期刊

CELL
卷 176, 期 5, 页码 1026-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.028

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01GM120553]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [HHSN272201700059C]
  3. Pew Biomedical Scholars Award
  4. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  5. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [Rubicon 019.2015.2.310.006]
  6. European Molecular Biology Organization [ALTF933-2015]
  7. Zoonoses Anticipation and Preparedness Initiative [IMI115760]
  8. Pasteur Institute
  9. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  10. LabEx Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases
  11. University of Washington Arnold and Mabel Beckman CryoEM Center and Proteomics Resource [UWPR95794]
  12. beamline 5.0.1 at the Advanced Light Source at Lawrence Berkley National Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome, along with the threat of a future coronavirus-mediated pandemic, underscore the importance of finding ways to combat these viruses. The trimeric spike transmembrane glycoprotein S mediates entry into host cells and is the major target of neutralizing antibodies. To understand the humoral immune response elicited upon natural infections with coronaviruses, we structurally characterized the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV S glycoproteins in complex with neutralizing antibodies isolated from human survivors. Although the two antibodies studied blocked attachment to the host cell receptor, only the anti-SARS-CoV S antibody triggered fusogenic conformational changes via receptor functional mimicry. These results provide a structural framework for understanding coronavirus neutralization by human antibodies and shed light on activation of coronavirus membrane fusion, which takes place through a receptor-driven ratcheting mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据