4.7 Article

Enhanced antioxidant and antifungal activity of chitosan derivatives bearing 6-O-imidazole-based quaternary ammonium salts

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 493-503

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.022

关键词

Chitosan; Antioxidant activity; Antifungal activity; Imidazole; Quaternary

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41576156]
  2. seed project of Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences [YIC Y755031011]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China [ZR 2017BD015]
  4. Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of Chinese Academy of sciences [KFJ-STSZDTP-023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a series of 6-O-imidazole-based quaternary ammonium chitosan derivatives via 6-O-chloroacetyl chitosan (CAClC) were successfully designed and synthesized. Detailed structural characterization was carried out by means of FTIR and H-1 NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. Furthermore, the antioxidant property against hydroxyl radicals, superoxide radicals, and DPPH radicals was evaluated in vitro. 2-(N,N,N-trimethyl)-6-O-(2-aminobenzimidazole)acetyl chitosan chloride (2NPhMC) and 2-(N,N,N-trimethyl)-6-O-(1-butylimidazole) acetyl chitosan chloride (NBMC) showed more than 90% scavenging indices at 1.6 mg/mL. Besides, the antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea and Gibberella zeae was estimated using in vitro MIC and hypha measurements. Most of the quaternized chitosan derivatives especially with the long length alkyl chain and primary amino group showed an inhibitory index of > 85% at 1.0 mg/mL against Botrytis cinerea. Besides, the cytotoxicity of chitosan and all the quaternized chitosan derivatives was evaluated in vitro on HaCaT cells and all the quaternized chitosan derivatives bearing 6-O-imidazole exhibited low cytotoxicity. These results suggested that chitosan derivatives bearing 6-O-imidazole-based quaternary ammonium salts may be used as good biomaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据