4.8 Article

Eomes+T-betlow CD8+ T Cells Are Functionally Impaired and Are Associated with Poor Clinical Outcome in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 79, 期 7, 页码 1635-1645

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3107

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. American Society of Hematology Scholar Award [191839]
  2. Penn State Cancer Institute Funds
  3. Kiesendahl Endowment funding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a devastating blood cancer with poor prognosis. Immunotherapy targeting inhibitory pathways to unleash the antileukemia T-cell response is a promising strategy for the treatment of leukemia, but we must first understand the underlying molecular mechanisms. Eomesodermin (Eomes) and T-bet are both T-box transcription factors that regulateCD8(+) T-cell responses in a context-specific manner. Here, we examined the role of these transcription factors in CD8(+) T-cell immunity in AML patients. We report that the frequency of Eomes(+) T-bet(low) CD8(+) T cells increased in newly diagnosed AML. This cell subset produced fewer cytokines and displayed reduced killing capacity, whereas depletion of Eomes by siRNA reversed these functional defects. Furthermore, Eomes bound the promoter of T-cell immuno-globulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) and positively regulated the expression of this inhibitory receptor on patient-derived T cells. A high frequency of Eomes(+)T-bet(low) CD8(+) T cells was associated with poor response to induction chemotherapy and shorter overall survival in AML patients. These findings have significant clinical implications as they not only identify a predictive and prognostic biomarker for AML, but they also provide an important target for effective leukemia therapeutics. Significance: These findings reveal that a high frequency of Eomes(+) T-bet(low) CD8(+) T cells predicts poor clinical outcome in AML and that targeting Eomes may provide a therapeutic benefit against AML.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据