4.8 Article

Targeting an RNA-Binding Protein Network in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

期刊

CANCER CELL
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 369-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.01.010

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [P30CA016087-30]
  2. NIH T32 Genome Integrity grant
  3. Conquer Cancer Foundation
  4. ASCOYoung Investigator Award
  5. Aplastic Anemia & Myelodysplastic Syndrome International Foundation research award
  6. AACR Lymphoma Research Fellowship
  7. US National Institutes of Health [R01 HL128239, 1R01 CA228135, 1R01 CA216421, 1R01CA194923, 1R01CA169784, 5RO1CA173636]
  8. Pershing Square Sohn Cancer Research Alliance
  9. Evans MDS Foundation
  10. Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research at MSK
  11. Department of Defense Bone Marrow Failure Research Program [BM150092, W81XWH-12-1-0041]
  12. Starr Cancer Consortium [I8-A8-075]
  13. Taub Foundation
  14. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society [6499-17]
  15. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer
  16. St. Baldrick's Cancer Research Foundation
  17. New York State Department of Health [CO030132, C32587GG, C32563GG]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are essential modulators of transcription and translation frequently dysregulated in cancer. We systematically interrogated RBP dependencies in human cancers using a comprehensive CRISPR/Cas9 domain-focused screen targeting RNA-binding domains of 490 classical RBPs. This uncovered a network of physically interacting RBPs upregulated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and crucial for maintaining RNA splicing and AML survival. Genetic or pharmacologic targeting of one key member of this network, RBM39, repressed cassette exon inclusion and promoted intron retention within mRNAs encoding HOXA9 targets as well as in other RBPs preferentially required in AML. The effects of RBM39 loss on splicing further resulted in preferential lethality of spliceosomal mutant AML, providing a strategy for treatment of AML bearing RBP splicing mutations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据