4.5 Article

KCNQ1OT1/miR-217/ZEB1 feedback loop facilitates cell migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer

期刊

CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 886-896

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2019.1579959

关键词

KCNQ1OT1; miR-217; ZEB1; colorectal cancer; migration

类别

资金

  1. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu [BK20161107]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Commission of Health and Family Planning Development Project [H2017042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long noncoding RNAs are widely acknowledged as a group of regulatory factors in various diseases, especially in cancers. KCNQ1 overlapping transcript 1 (KCNQ1OT1) has been reported as oncogene in human cancers. However, the role of KCNQ1OT1 in colorectal cancer (CRC) has not been fully explained. Based on the database analysis, KCNQ1OT1 was highly expressed in CRC samples and predicted the poor prognosis for CRC patients. Functional experiments revealed that KCNQ1OT1 knockdown negatively affected the proliferation, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in CRC cells. Moreover, we identified the cytoplasmic localization of KCNQ1OT1 in CRC cells, indicating the post-transcriptional regulation of KCNQ1OT1 on gene expression. Mechanism experiments including RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay and dual luciferase reporter assays verified that KCNQ1OT1 acted as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) in CRC by sponging microRNA-217 (miR-217) to up-regulate the expression of zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1). Further mechanism investigation revealed that ZEB1 enhanced the transcription activity of KCNQ1OT1 by acting as a transcription activator. Finally, rescue assays were designed to demonstrate the effect of KCNQ1OT1-miR-217-ZEB1 feedback loop on proliferation, migration, and EMT of CRC cells. In brief, our research findings revealed that ZEB1-induced upregulation of KCNQ1OT1 improved the proliferation, migration and EMT formation of CRC cells via regulation of miR-217/ZEB1 axis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据