4.7 Article

Sustainable design model for analysis of relationships among building height, CO2 emissions, and cost of core walls in office buildings in Korea

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 289-296

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.017

关键词

Embodied CO2 emissions; Construction material cost; Sustainable design model; Office buildings with shear walls; Optimal structural design

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean government (MSIP) [2011-0018360, 2018R1A5A1025137]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A5A1025137, 2011-0018360] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A shear wall is a vertical member with a relatively large volume that is used frequently as a vertical passage and a lateral load support system in every building without exception. Many studies have been conducted on the sustainable design of buildings, but few have studied the sustainable design of shear walls considering CO2 emissions. Herein, a sustainable design model for shear walls is developed to analyze the relationship between building height, CO2 emissions, and construction cost. The model is applied to the sustainable design of shear walls installed in a 42-story mixed-use building. The characteristics in the change in CO2 emissions and the construction cost according to the building height were analyzed using the slenderness ratio as a variable. The results indicated that as the slenderness ratio increased, the CO2 emissions increased almost linearly in proportion to the height. In particular, when the slenderness ratio increased from 4.40 to 4.93, which is known to be the limit of the efficient applicability of shear walls, the CO2 emissions tended to increase more rapidly. When the slenderness ratio was 4.93, the CO2 emissions for the shear wall were reduced to 27.24% by the proposed model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据