4.7 Article

Development of the data-driven thermal satisfaction prediction model as a function of human physiological responses in a built environment

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 206-218

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.007

关键词

Occupant behavior; Thermal satisfaction estimation; Physiological response; Skin temperature; Heart rate

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [1707068]
  2. USC James H. Zumberge research and innovation fund
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1707068] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study is to investigate and determine the relationship between occupants' thermal satisfaction and physiological responses in an office environment, and to estimate their thermal satisfaction level via human physiological signals. This study adapted the heart rate and seven local body skin temperatures as physiological signals, as well as human factors (gender, age, BMI), to determine establish a thermal satisfaction prediction model by combining human factors and physiological signals. The results revealed significant correlations between overall thermal satisfaction levels and local body skin temperatures, as well as heart rates. The heart rates showed a negative correlation with overall thermal satisfaction, and the skin temperature of the forehead, arm, wrist (back and front), chest, and belly also revealed a significant correlation with the thermal satisfaction levels of the study participants. This study also determined the order and priority of local skin temperatures (as well as gender and BMI) by their impact on thermal satisfaction. Considering all human physiological factors and practical application of the results, the local skin temperatures of the forehead, wrist (back), and gender demonstrated 88.52% accuracy for estimating thermal satisfaction, which provided significant validation for practical use of this procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据