4.7 Article

A novel method to determine the formaldehyde emission characteristic parameters of building materials at multiple temperatures

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 436-445

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.041

关键词

Indoor air quality; Formaldehyde; Emission characteristic parameters; Building materials; Temperature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808441]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M633515]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XJJ2018077]
  4. Xi'an Science and Technology Planning Project [201805034YD12CG18(1)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Formaldehyde emissions of building materials are greatly influenced by the indoor air temperature. An accurate evaluation of the influence of formaldehyde emissions on indoor air quality requires an investigation of the emission characteristic parameters at different temperatures. Based on the adsorption potential theory, this paper derived the correlation between the initial emittable concentration (C-0) and the partition coefficient (K) of formaldehyde emissions from building materials. On account of the characteristics of a high equilibrium concentration of formaldehyde emissions under high temperatures in an airtight environment, a step temperature rising emission (STRE) method to simultaneously determine the characteristic parameters of formaldehyde emissions at multiple temperatures was proposed. This innovative method was validated by theoretical models in the literature and via independent experiments. In addition, an optimization method for determining the appropriate volumetric air/material phase ratio was discussed and analyzed to improve the accuracy and reliability of the STRE method. This method aims to improve the measurement efficiency of the emission characteristic parameters and provides inspiration for evaluating the hazard posed by formaldehyde emissions from furniture and building materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据