4.6 Article

Combination lenalidomide-rituximab immunotherapy activates anti-tumour immunity and induces tumour cell death by complementary mechanisms of action in follicular lymphoma

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 185, 期 2, 页码 240-253

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15797

关键词

lenalidomide; follicular lymphoma; non-Hodgkin lymphoma; immunomodulation; antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity

资金

  1. Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemotherapy plus rituximab has been the mainstay of treatment for follicular lymphoma (FL) for two decades but is associated with immunosuppression and relapse. In phase 2 studies, lenalidomide combined with rituximab (R-2) has shown clinical synergy in front-line and relapsed/refractory FL. Here, we show that lenalidomide reactivated dysfunctional T and Natural Killer (NK) cells exvivo from FL patients by enhancing proliferative capacity and T-helper cell type 1 (Th1) cytokine release. In combination with rituximab, lenalidomide improved antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in sensitive and chemo-resistant FL cells, via a cereblon-dependent mechanism. While single-agent lenalidomide and rituximab increased formation of lytic NK cell immunological synapses with primary FL tumour cells, the combination was superior and correlated with enhanced cytotoxicity. Immunophenotyping of FL patient samples from a phase 3 trial revealed that R-2 treatment increased circulating T- and NK-cell counts, while R-chemotherapy was associated with reduced cell numbers. Finally, using an invitro model of myeloid differentiation, we demonstrated that lenalidomide caused a reversible arrest in neutrophil maturation that was distinct from a cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent, which may help explain the lower rates of neutropenia observed with R(2)versus R-chemotherapy. Taken together, we believe these data support a paradigm shift in the treatment of FL - moving from combination immunochemotherapy to chemotherapy-free immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据