4.6 Article

The impact of cytogenetics on duration of response and overall survival in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (long-term follow-up results from BSBMT/UKMF Myeloma X Relapse [Intensive]): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 185, 期 3, 页码 450-467

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15782

关键词

relapsed multiple myeloma; cytogenetics; duration of response; overall survival; salvage ASCT

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [A7264]
  2. Janssen-Cilag
  3. Chugai Pharma, UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Myeloma X trial (ISCRTN60123120) registered patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Participants were randomised between salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or weekly cyclophosphamide following re-induction therapy. Cytogenetic analysis performed at trial registration defined t(4;14), t(14;16) and del(17p) as high-risk. The effect of cytogenetics on time to progression (TTP) and overall survival was investigated. At 76 months median follow-up, ASCT improved TTP compared to cyclophosphamide (19 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 16-26) vs. 11 months (9-12), hazard ratio [HR]: 0 center dot 40, 95% CI: 0 center dot 29-0 center dot 56, P < 0 center dot 001), on which the presence of any single high-risk lesion had a detrimental impact [likelihood ratio test (LRT): P = 0 center dot 011]. ASCT also improved OS [67 months (95% CI 59-not reached) vs. 55 months (44-67), HR: 0 center dot 64, 95% CI: 0 center dot 42-0 center dot 99, P = 0 center dot 0435], with evidence of a detrimental impact with MYC rearrangement (LRT: P = 0 center dot 021). Twenty-one (24 center dot 7%) cyclophosphamide patients received an ASCT post-trial, median OS was not reached (95% CI: 39-not reached) for these participants compared to 31 months (22-39), in those who did not receive a post-trial ASCT. The analysis further supports the benefit of salvage ASCT, which may still be beneficial after second relapse in surviving patients. There is evidence that this benefit reduces in cytogenetic high-risk patients, highlighting the need for targeted study in this patient group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据