4.3 Review

Multi-Scale Neural Sources of EEG: Genuine, Equivalent, and Representative. A Tutorial Review

期刊

BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 193-214

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-019-00701-3

关键词

EEG; Sources; Synchronization; Dipole localization; Laplacian; Spatial scale

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health of the United States Grant [2R01MH68004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A biophysical framework needed to interpret electrophysiological data recorded at multiple spatial scales of brain tissue is developed. Micro current sources at membrane surfaces produce local field potentials, electrocorticography, and electroencephalography (EEG). We categorize multi-scale sources as genuine, equivalent, or representative. Genuine sources occur at the micro scale of cell surfaces. Equivalent sources provide identical experimental outcomes over a range of scales and applications. In contrast, each representative source distribution is just one of many possible source distributions that yield similar experimental outcomes. Macro sources (dipoles) may be defined at the macrocolumn (mm) scale and depend on several features of the micro sources-magnitudes, micro synchrony within columns, and distribution through the cortical depths. These micro source properties are determined by brain dynamics and the columnar structure of cortical tissue. The number of representative sources underlying EEG data depends on the spatial scale of neural tissue under study. EEG inverse solutions (e.g. dipole localization) and high resolution estimates (e.g. Laplacian, dura imaging) have both strengths and limitations that depend on experimental conditions. The proposed theoretical framework informs studies of EEG source localization, source characterization, and low pass filtering. It also facilitates interpretations of brain dynamics and cognition, including measures of synchrony, functional connections between cortical locations, and other aspects of brain complexity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据