4.7 Article

Tau PET in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: relationship with cognition, dementia and other biomarkers

期刊

BRAIN
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 1063-1076

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz019

关键词

Alzheimer's; MRI; FDG; amyloid; flortaucipir

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K01AG053474, R01AG052550, UFAG 032438, UL1TR000448, P30NS098577, R01EB009352, P50AG05131, U01AG042791, U01AG042791-S1, R1AG046179]
  2. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Queen Square Dementia Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Medical Research Council Dementias Platform UK [MR/L023784/1, MR/009076/1]
  5. Alzheimer's Association
  6. Eli Lilly and Company
  7. Genentech/Roche
  8. Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
  9. Cogstate
  10. Bracket
  11. GHR Foundation
  12. DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium
  13. Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation
  14. Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Research Initiative
  15. Hope Center for Neurological Disorders
  16. Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology
  17. Paula and Rodger Riney fund
  18. Brennan fund
  19. NIH [1S10RR022984-01A1, 1S10OD018091-01]
  20. MRC [MR/L023784/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tauopathy is a hallmark pathology of Alzheimer's disease with a strong relationship with cognitive impairment. As such, understanding tau may be a key to clinical interventions. In vivo tauopathy has been measured using cerebrospinal fluid assays, but these do not provide information about where pathology is in the brain. The introduction of PET ligands that bind to paired helical filaments provides the ability to measure the amount and distribution of tau pathology. The heritability of the age of dementia onset tied to the specific mutations found in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease families provides an elegant model to study the spread of tau across the course of the disease as well as the cross-modal relationship between tau and other biomarkers. To better understand the pathobiology of Alzheimer's disease we measured levels of tau PET binding in individuals with dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease using data from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN). We examined cross-sectional measures of amyloid-beta, tau, glucose metabolism, and grey matter degeneration in 15 cognitively normal mutation non-carriers, 20 asymptomatic carriers, and 15 symptomatic mutation carriers. Linear models examined the association of pathology with group, estimated years to symptom onset, as well as cross-modal relationships. For comparison, tau PET was acquired on 17 older adults with sporadic, late onset Alzheimer disease. Tau PET binding was starkly elevated in symptomatic DIAN individuals throughout the cortex. The brain areas demonstrating elevated tau PET binding overlapped with those seen in sporadic Alzheimer's disease, but with a greater cortical involvement and greater levels of binding despite similar cognitive impairment. Tau PET binding was elevated in the temporal lobe, but the most prominent loci of pathology were in the precuneus and lateral parietal regions. Symptomatic mutation carriers also demonstrated elevated tau PET binding in the basal ganglia, consistent with prior work with amyloid-beta. The degree of tau tracer binding in symptomatic individuals was correlated to other biomarkers, particularly markers of neurodegeneration. In addition to the differences seen with tau, amyloid-beta was increased in both asymptomatic and symptomatic groups relative to non-carriers. Glucose metabolism showed decline primarily in the symptomatic group. MRI indicated structural degeneration in both asymptomatic and symptomatic cohorts. We demonstrate that tau PET binding is elevated in symptomatic individuals with dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. Tau PET uptake was tied to the onset of cognitive dysfunction, and there was a higher amount, and different regional pattern of binding compared to late onset, non-familial Alzheimer's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据