4.1 Article

HIF-1 transcription activity: HIF1A driven response in normoxia and in hypoxia

期刊

BMC MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12881-019-0767-1

关键词

Hypoxia inducible factor HIF1A; RNA sequencing; DNA methylation; Neuroblastoma

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [20757, 19255]
  2. Ministero della Salute [GR-2011-02348722]
  3. Fondazione Italiana per la Lotta al Neuroblastoma
  4. OPEN Associazione Oncologica Pediatrica e Neuroblastoma. : Regione Campania SATIN grant 2018-2020
  5. Fondazione Umberto Veronesi post-Doc Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundHIF1A (Hypoxia-Inducible-Factor 1A) expression in solid tumors is relevant to establish resistance to therapeutic approaches. The use of compounds direct against hypoxia signaling and HIF1A does not show clinical efficiency because of changeable oxygen concentrations in solid tumor areas. The identification of HIF1A targets expressed in both normoxia and hypoxia and of HIF1A/hypoxia signatures might meliorate the prognostic stratification and therapeutic successes in patients with high-risk solid tumors.MethodsIn this study, we conducted a combined analysis of RNA expression and DNA methylation of neuroblastoma cells silenced or unsilenced for HIF1A expression, grown in normoxia and hypoxia conditions.ResultsThe analysis of pathways highlights HIF-1 (heterodimeric transcription factor 1) activity in normoxia in metabolic process and HIF-1 activity in hypoxia in neuronal differentiation process. HIF1A driven transcriptional response in hypoxia depends on epigenetic control at DNA methylation status of gene regulatory regions. Furthermore, low oxygen levels generate HIF1A-dependent or HIF1A-independent signatures, able to stratify patients according to risk categories.ConclusionsThese findings may help to understand the molecular mechanisms by which low oxygen levels reshape gene signatures and provide new direction for hypoxia targeting in solid tumor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据