4.2 Article

Decreased fracture incidence with traditional Chinese medicine therapy in patients with osteoporosis: a nationwide population-based cohort study

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12906-019-2446-3

关键词

National Health Insurance Research Database; Osteoporotic fracture; Traditional Chinese medicine

资金

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial Center [MOHW106-TDU-B-212-113004]
  2. China Medical University Hospital, Academia Sinica Taiwan Biobank Stroke Biosignature Project [BM10601010036]
  3. Taiwan Clinical Trial Consortium for Stroke [MOST 106-2321-B-039-005]
  4. Tseng-Lien Lin Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan
  5. Taiwan Brain Disease Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan
  6. Katsuzo and Kiyo Aoshima Memorial Funds, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThere are no published studies regarding the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for the prevention of osteoporotic fracture. Therefore, we conducted this nationwide, population-based cohort study to investigate the probable effect of TCM to decrease the fracture rate.MethodsWe identified cases with osteoporosis and selected a comparison group that was frequency-matched according to sex, age (per 5years), diagnosis year of osteoporosis, and index year. The difference between the two groups in the development of fracture was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.ResultsAfter inserting age, gender, urbanization level, and comorbidities into the Cox's proportional hazard model, patients who used TCM had a lower hazard ratio (HR) of fracture (adjusted HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.37-0.59) compared to the non-TCM user group. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that osteoporosis patients who used TCM had a lower incidence of fracture events than those who did not (p<0.00001). Our study also demonstrated that the longer the TCM use, the lesser the fracture rate.ConclusionOur study showed that TCM might have a positive impact on the prevention of osteoporotic fracture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据