4.7 Article

A phase 1 trial of ibrutinib plus palbociclib in previously treated mantle cell lymphoma

期刊

BLOOD
卷 133, 期 11, 页码 1201-1204

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-886457

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP)
  2. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [RO1CA18894, 1K24 CA201524-01]
  3. Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Scholar award
  4. Translational Research Grants from Lymphoma Research Foundation
  5. V-Foundation
  6. Mantle Cell Lymphoma Research Initiative Award from the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society [MCL7001-18]
  7. Sarah Cannon Fund at the HCA Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-agent ibrutinib is active in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, nearly half of all patients experience treatment failure during the first year. We previously demonstrated that prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest induced by the oral, specific CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib can overcome ibrutinib resistance in primary human MCL cells and MCL cell lines expressing wild-type Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK). Therefore, we conducted a phase 1 trial to evaluate the dosing, safety, and preliminary activity of palbociclib plus ibrutinib in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma. From August 2014 to June 2016, a total of 27 patients (21 men, 6 women) were enrolled. The maximum tolerated doses were ibrutinib 560 mg daily plus palbociclib 100 mg on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle. The dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 rash. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities included neutropenia (41%), thrombocytopenia (30%), hypertension (15%), febrile neutropenia (15%), and lung infection (11%). The overall and complete response rates were 67% and 37%, and with a median follow-up of 25.6 months, the 2-year progression-free survival was 59.4% and the 2-year response duration was 69.8%. A phase 2 multicenter clinical trial to further characterize efficacy is now ongoing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据