4.6 Article

Potential Predictors of Poor Visual Outcome in Human Leukocyte Antigen-B27-Associated Uveitis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 179-187

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.02.024

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To identify potential predictors of permanent vision loss in patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27-associated uveitis in a tertiary referral center. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. METHODS: The charts of 212 patients (338 eyes) with HLA-B27-associated uveitis that visited the University Medical Center Utrecht with a follow-up of at least 6 months were retrospectively studied. Clinical features at presentation and during follow-up were compared to final visual outcome in quiescent state. Eyes with (sub-) normal vision ( > 20/50) were compared with visually impaired (<= 20/50) and blind (<= 5/50, or a visual field of < 10 degrees) eyes, using survival analysis. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to analyze potential predictors for permanent vision loss. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 10.4 years (range, 0.5-44.7 years). During follow-up 226 eyes (66%) experienced vision loss up to 20/50, but most recovered. Twenty patients (9%) became permanently visually impaired or blind in at least 1 eye because of uveitis, after a median of 9.7 years (range, 0-20.9 years). The main cause was secondary glaucoma or related to glaucoma surgery (12/22 eyes, 55%). Survival analysis showed, after adjustment for age and sex, an ocular pressure of > 21 mm Hg, hypotony, and panuveitis to be potential predictors at presentation, and the development of secondary glaucoma or hypotony to be predictors of blindness or visual impairment during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term visual prognosis of HLA-B27-associated uveitis is relatively good, but the true incidence of permanent vision loss is probably still underestimated. Our findings highlight the importance of proper control of intraocular pressure. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据