4.8 Article

Ultra-sensitive electrochemical detection of bacteremia enabled by redox-active gold nanoparticles (raGNPs) in a nano-sieving microfluidic system (NS-MFS)

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 215-222

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.03.040

关键词

Amperometric biosensor; Electropolymerized self-assembled layer; Bacteremia; Nano-sieving microfluidic system; Redox-active gold nanoparticles

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [104-2221-E-007-072-MY3, 104-2321-B-007-003, 106-2622-E-007-020-CC2, 106-2923-E-007-004-MY3, 107-2622-E-007-006-CC2, 107-2221-E-007-012-MY3]
  2. Frontier Research Center on Fundamental and Applied Sciences of Matters, from The Featured Areas Research Center Program [MOE 107QR00115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early diagnosis of bacterial infections is crucial to improving survival rates by enabling treatment with appropriate antibiotics within the first few hours of infection. This paper presents a highly sensitive amperometric biosensor for the detection of several pathogenic bacterial cells in blood plasma around 30 min. The proposed device is based on an electropolymerized self-assembled layer on gold nanoparticles operated in a portable nano-sieving microfluidic system (NS-MFS). The redox-active gold nanoparticles (raGNPs) enhanced the electrical conductivity and provided a greater number of electrochemically active molecules for sensing, while improving resistance to the fouling of sensors by oxidation products in blood plasma. The detection limit of the device has been shown to reach 10 CFU/mL for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus spiked in plasma. The dynamic range of the sensing system falls between 10 and 10(5) CFU/mL in a buffer solution by cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements. The results demonstrated that the raGNPs/NS-MFS can successful detect P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in human plasma, and is very useful for the diagnosis of bacteremia from clinical samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据