4.8 Article

Biohythane production of post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater: A comparison of two-stage fermentation and catalytic hydrothermal gasification

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 335-342

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.095

关键词

Biohythane; Hydrothermal liquefaction; Post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater; Two-stage fermentation; Catalytic hydrothermal gasification

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0501402]
  2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [RTTC-C-R2-01-001]
  3. Beijing Youth Top-notch Talents Program [2015000026833ZK10]
  4. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship [20170086]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing efficient methods to recover energy from post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater (PHW) is critical for scaling up hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) technology. Here we evaluated two-stage fermentation (TF) and catalytic hydrothermal gasification (CHG) for biohythane production using PHW. A hydrogen yield of 29 mL.g(-1) COD and methane yield of 254 mL.g(-1) COD were achieved via TF. In comparison, a higher hydrogen yield (116 mL.g(-1) COD) and lower methane yield (65 mL.g(-1) COD) were achieved during CHG. Further, a techno-economic and sensitivity analysis was conducted. The capital cost and operating cost for TF varied with the different reactor systems. TF with high-rate reactors suggested its promising commercialized application as it had a lower minimum selling price (-0.71 to 2.59 USD per gallon of gasoline equivalent) compared with conventional fossil fuels under both the best and reference market conditions. Compared with TF, CHG was only likely to be profitable under the best case conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据