4.5 Article

A Nondimensional Model Reveals Alterations in Nuclear Mechanics upon Hepatitis C Virus Replication

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 116, 期 7, 页码 1328-1339

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.02.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India
  2. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India
  3. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research fellowship from Government of India
  4. Indian Council of Medical Research fellowship from Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Morphology of the nucleus is an important regulator of gene expression. Nuclear morphology is in turn a function of the forces acting on it and the mechanical properties of the nuclear envelope. Here, we present a two-parameter, non-dimensional mechanical model of the nucleus that reveals a relationship among nuclear shape parameters, such as projected area, surface area, and volume. Our model fits the morphology of individual nuclei and predicts the ratio between forces and modulus in each nucleus. We analyzed the changes in nuclear morphology of liver cells due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection using this model. The model predicted a decrease in the elastic modulus of the nuclear envelope and an increase in the pre-tension in cortical actin as the causes for the change in nuclear morphology. These predictions were validated biomechanically by showing that liver cells expressing HCV proteins possessed enhanced cellular stiffness and reduced nuclear stiffness. Concomitantly, cells expressing HCV proteins showed downregulation of lamin-A, C and upregulation of beta-actin, corroborating the predictions of the model. Our modeling assumptions are broadly applicable to adherent, monolayer cell cultures, making the model amenable to investigate changes in nuclear mechanics due to other stimuli by merely measuring nuclear morphology. Toward this, we present two techniques, graphical and numerical, to use our model for predicting physical changes in the nucleus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据