4.0 Article

Role of AMPA receptor stimulation and TrkB signaling in the antidepressant-like effect of ketamine co-administered with a group II mGlu receptor antagonist, LY341495, in the forced swim test in rats

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 471-477

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000471

关键词

AMPA receptor; antidepressant; forced swim test; ketamine; LY341495; rat; TrkB receptor

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [2014/13/B/NZ7/02222]
  2. Funds for Statutory Activity of the Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ketamine has been shown to induce a rapid antidepressant effect on patients with depression. In many animal models, both rapid and sustained antidepressant activities were also found in response to an antagonist of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors, LY341495, and its mechanism of action seemed to be similar in many ways to the action of ketamine. It has also been found that LY341495 enhanced the antidepressant-like activity of sub-effective doses of ketamine in rats without inducing adverse effects. Here, we investigated the role of AMPA receptor and TrkB receptor activation in the antidepressant-like effects of ketamine (3 mg/kg) co-administered with LY341495 (0.1 mg/kg), in the forced swim test in rats, at three time points (40 min, 3 h and 24 h) after joint administration of the tested compounds. It was found that the AMPA receptor antagonist NBQX (10 mg/kg) reversed the antidepressant effect of ketamine co-administered with LY341495 at all tested time points, whereas the TrkB receptor antagonist ANA-12 contributed to blockade of the effect of ketamine and LY341495 3 h after their joint administration. These results indicate that activation of AMPA receptor and BDNF-related signaling may play a role in the mechanism of antidepressant action of ketamine co-administered with LY341495. Copyright (C) 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据