期刊
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS
卷 63, 期 2, 页码 221-246出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.12292
关键词
best-worst scaling; discrete choice experiment; external validity; ranking conjoint analysis; willingness to pay
资金
- Center for Agro-food Economy and Development
- Polytechnic University of Catalonia
- Borges International Group
This study assesses the comparability of discrete choice experiment (DCE), ranking conjoint analysis (RCA) and multiprofile best-worst scaling (BWS) in a nonhypothetical context in terms of estimated partworths, willingness to pay (WTP), response consistency and external validity. Overall, the results suggest that: (i) the conjoint analysis formats that were used in this study provide similar estimated WTP, but different estimated partworths and computed external validity; (ii) the inclusion of the full ranking information in the estimation of the parameters of interest affects the estimated partworths, but not the estimated WTP; and (iii) it is more appropriate to use multiprofile BWS over DCE and RCA because it has better predictive power of consumers' preferences and provides estimated WTP comparable to those obtained in the others conjoint analysis formats. The BWS' cognitive process could be considered clearness for participants implying significant increment of its predictive power.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据