4.4 Article

Genetic evolutionary analysis of soybean mosaic virus populations from three geographic locations in China based on the P1 and CP genes

期刊

ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY
卷 164, 期 4, 页码 1037-1048

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-019-04165-5

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan [2017YFD0301704, 2018YFD0200700, 2018YFD0201006]
  2. Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Project [2016NYZ0053]
  3. Research Foundation of Sichuan Provincial Education Department [035Z1038]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Department [2015NZ0040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is one of the major pathogens causing serious soybean losses. Little is known about the genetic structure and evolutionary biology of the SMV population in southwestern China. In this study, 29 SMV isolates were obtainedfrom Sichuan Province, and the genomic regions encoding the first protein (P1) and coat protein (CP) were sequenced. Combined with SMV isolates from the southeastern and northeastern regions of China, the genetic and molecular evolution of SMV was studied. Recombination analysis revealed that intraspecific and interspecific recombination had occurred in the SMV population. A phylogenetic tree based on the P1 gene reflected the geographic origin of the non-interspecific recombinant SMV (SMV-NI), while a tree based on the CP gene did not. Though frequent gene flow of the SMV-NI populations was found between the southeastern and northeastern populations, the southwestern population was relatively independent. Genetic differentiation was significant between the SMV interspecific recombinant (SMV-RI) and the non-interspecific recombinant (SMV-NI) populations. It was interesting to note that there was an almost identical recombination breakpoint in SMV-RI and Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV). Population dynamics showed that SMV-RI might be in an expanding state, while the SMV-NI population is relatively stable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据