4.4 Article

High Ki-67 expression is significantly associated with poor prognosis of ovarian cancer patients: evidence from a meta-analysis

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
卷 299, 期 5, 页码 1415-1427

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05082-3

关键词

Ovarian cancer; ki-67; Meta-analysis; Prognostic value

资金

  1. Health Department and Finance Department of Guangdong Province [B2018237, A2016450]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveThe prognostic significance of Ki-67 expression in patients with ovarian cancer was controversial in various studies. Therefore, we carried out a meta-analysis to determine the prognostic significance of Ki-67 in ovarian cancer patients.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database and WanFang digital database for eligible studies from January 1, 1990 to June 1, 2017. The pooled hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess the prognostic significance of Ki-67 expression for overall survival in ovarian cancer patients.ResultsFinally, 38 eligible studies and 5004 ovarian cancer patients were included in the current study. The pooled hazard ratio was 1.35 (95% confidence interval 1.24-1.46, P=0.001) for overall survival in ovarian cancer patients. The funnel plot bias was obviously asymmetrical and Egger's test also detected significant publication bias (P=0.001). The Contour-enhanced funnel plot with trim-and-fill method supplemented 11 dummy studies to balance the funnel plot and nine new supplementary studies were in area with statistical significance. Sensitivity analysis and cumulative meta-analysis further demonstrated that the association between high Ki-67 expression and poor overall survival of ovarian cancer patients was stable and reliable.ConclusionsHigh Ki-67 expression is significantly related to poor overall survival and may serve as a prognostic biomarker for ovarian cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据