4.7 Article

Abnormal energy identification of variable refrigerant flow air-conditioning systems based on data mining techniques

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 398-411

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.133

关键词

Abnormal energy identification; Operation conditions; Variable refrigerant flow system; Local outlier factor; Support vector regression; Support vector data description

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576074, 51328602]
  2. Huazhong University of Science and Technology National Undergraduate Innovation Training Project [16A245]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying abnormal energy consumption in the variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system is important for its energy efficiency enhancement and energy saving. The energy performances of the VRF system are extremely distinct under various operation conditions. In order to evaluate the VRF's energy performance, this study proposes a data-mining-based method to identify the abnormal energy consumption under different operation conditions. The local outlier factor (LOF) algorithm is used to distinguish transient data and three operation conditions are partitioned through clustering analysis. Besides, the correlation analysis is employed for key variables extraction. Then, the energy consumption is forecasted by support vector regression (SVR). The residuals of the measured energy values and the predicted values are applied in support vector data description (SVDD) algorithm to develop the responding D statistic as abnormal energy identification threshold. Finally, experiment data of various refrigerant charge level (RCL) are used to validate the proposed method. The methodology is sensitive to identifying abnormal energy consumption in VRFs at various RCLs. Nearly 100% of the abnormal energy consumption data can be accurately identified at some refrigerant charge levels. Operation condition partitioning can definitely enhance the identification efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据