4.7 Article

Surface and interface engineering of hierarchical photocatalysts

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 471, 期 -, 页码 43-87

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.205

关键词

Heterogeneous photocatalysis; Hierarchical photocatalyst; Interface engineering; Surface modification; Z-Scheme heterojunction; Cocatalyst

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672089]
  2. special funding on Applied Science and technology in Guangdong [2017B020238005]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Material Synthesis and Processing (Wuhan University of Technology) [2015-KF-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In developing efficient heterogeneous photocatalysts, the design and fabrication of hierarchical semiconductors at the micro/nanometer scales have received much attention during the past decade due to their unique advantages in addressing the critical problems during photocatalysis. However, there are still many challenges in designing and constructing highly efficient hierarchical photocatalysts. Thus, in this review, we first systematically summarize and discusse the fundamentals and important interface engineering strategies of designing hierarchical photocatalysts, such as fabricating Z-Scheme heterojunctions, constructing Schottky-based heterojunctions, creating carbon-based heterojunctions and designing multicomponent heterojunctions. Then, especially, the different surface modification approaches of hierarchical porous photocatalysts, including loading cocatalysts, exposing the reactive facets, introducing defects/heteroatoms, adding photosensitizers, are highlighted. Finally, the major conclusions are made regarding this promising class of heterogeneous photocatalysts, and some perspectives are given on its future development. Through studying the important advances on this topic, it may pave a new avenue for fabricating highly effective hierarchical semiconductors for various applications in photocatalysis, electrocatalysis, thermal catalysis and other fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据