4.7 Article

In-situ synthesis of MnCo2O4.5 nanosheets on reduced graphene oxide for a great promotion in the thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 483, 期 -, 页码 496-505

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.266

关键词

MnCo2O4.5; Nanosheets; Reduced graphene oxide; Ammonium perchlorate; Synergistic effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576101]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30918015102]
  3. Qing Lan Project
  4. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX18_0478]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, ternary transition metal oxides MnCo2O4.5 nanosheets was anchored on reduced graphene oxide (RGO/MnCo2O4.5 NSs) in an in-situ way for catalyzing ammonium perchlorate (AP). XRD, FT-IR, Raman, EDX, XPS, SEM, TEM, HR-TEM, SAED and nitrogen absorption-desorption techniques were applied to characterize the structure and morphology of the catalyst. The catalytic performances for the thermal decomposition of AP were investigated using DSC and TG. The results show that the MnCo2O4.5 nanosheets are vertically grown on RGO sheets to form a hierarchically porous structure, which is remarkably effective to avoid both the aggregation of MnCo2O4.5 NSs and the re-stacking of RGO. The introduction of RGO will significantly lead to an increase in conductivity and specific surface area. Just for that reason and the synergetic effect between RGO and MnCo2O4.5 NSs, the synthesized RGO/MnCo2O4.5 NSs composites gets the low-temperature decomposition peak of AP disappeared, the high-temperature decomposition temperature reduced by as high as 124.1 degrees C, the activation energy decreased from 221.04 to 129.85 kJ.mol(-1), and the reaction rate increased incredibly up to 186.8 times when compared with corresponding data of the pure AP. Furthermore, the catalytic mechanism of the RGO/MnCo2O4.5 NSs has been discussed either based upon the electron-transfer theory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据