4.7 Article

Layer by layer 2D MoS2/rGO hybrids: An optimized microwave absorber for high-efficient microwave absorption

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 470, 期 -, 页码 899-907

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.195

关键词

Intermediate reduction; 2D MoS2/rGO; Layer by layer architectures; Microwave absorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [51772029, 51572027]
  2. Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education, China [313007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Constructing heterostructured microwave absorbers out of low dimensional nanomaterials has been proved an effective method for enhancing the attenuation ability and boarding the effective attenuation bandwidth in electromagnetic wave (EMW) absorbing area. By using a simple intermediate reduction mixing process, 2D layer by layer hierarchical architectures of few-layered MoS2 nanosheets (NMS) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) are prepared under different volume ratios, which achieve enhanced EMW absorption performance with respect to the pure NMS or rGO. The minimum reflection loss (RL) value of NMS/rGO-5:1 with 20 wt% loading is -55 dB under 2.2 mm compared to -38.42 dB of pure NMS with 60% loading under 2.4 mm or -37.2 dB of pure rGO with 30% loading under 3.5 mm. The effective attenuation bandwidth (EAB, < -10 dB) of NMS/rGO-2:1 with 25% loading is up to similar to 6.96 GHz. The enhanced performance of NMS/rGO is attributed to the strong interfacial polarization loss resulting from the NMS/rGO heterojunctions, as well as the defect dipole polarization loss, conduction loss and scattering loss. Furthermore, this work demonstrates the easy fabrication of layer by layer NMS/rGO heterojunctions, paving a way for harvesting unique physicochemical properties of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides/graphene composites. Considering the enhanced EMW absorption performance and greatly reduced filler loading, the resulting 2D layer by layer NMS/rGO show promising prospect in the area of microwave absorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据