4.8 Article

Planning strategies to address operational and price uncertainty in biodiesel production

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 238, 期 -, 页码 1573-1581

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.195

关键词

Compositional uncertainty; Feedstock blending; Forecast models; Optimization; Time series analysis; Waste cooking oil

资金

  1. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) [SFRH/BD/51952/2012, FEDER/FCT\PTDC/AGR-FOR/1510/2014 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016764), FEDER/FCT\PTDC/AAG-MAA/6234/2014 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016765)]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/51952/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of low-cost feedstocks such as waste cooking oils has gained prominence in biodiesel production due to its potential economic and environmental advantages. Since these feedstocks are derived from multiple sources, its compositional variability has led to quality concerns that may significantly limit its utilization. One potential strategy to address this concern is to use stochastic blending models to optimize the mixing of secondary and primary oils (e.g., palm, canola, or soya). In this paper, we present a stochastic blending model that embeds a second, key source of uncertainty: the future price of feedstocks, a topic of tremendous concern for producers. The stochastic blending model embeds a chance-constrained formulation to account for compositional variability and uses time-series methods to address feedstock price uncertainty. The model was developed to support production-planning decisions to minimize cost and cost variation in biodiesel production. We demonstrate that the proposed approach is useful for determining an optimal planning of feedstock acquisition, blending and storage in order to minimize the risks associated with feedstock price fluctuations. Results show that addressing the compositional uncertainty via the chance-constrained formulation will allow for the use of waste cooking oil in biodiesel blends without compromising their technical performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据