4.8 Article

Correlating variability of modeling parameters with photovoltaic performance: Monte Carlo simulation of a meso-structured perovskite solar cell

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 131-144

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.066

关键词

Monte Carlo simulation; Perovskite solar cell; Cell performance; Sensitivity analysis; Stochastic parameters

资金

  1. National University of Singapore (NUS)
  2. Singapore's National Research Foundation (NRF) through the Singapore Economic Development Board (EDB)
  3. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore, under its Energy Innovation Research Program (EIRP-13) [NRF-2015-EWT-EIRP003-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photovoltaic performance of a perovskite solar cell is evaluated as a function of its material properties, device geometry, and operating conditions. We conduct a Monte Carlo simulation based on a mechanistic model for meso-structured perovskite solar cell to correlate the device performance with the variability of input modeling parameters. The presented sensitivity analysis is statistically performed in two different scenarios: first by varying the modeling parameters individually, and second by varying all of them simultaneously. The stochastic parameters are ranked and quantified according to their contributions to the variation of the cell performance, thereby providing insights for optimum device performance. Furthermore, a reduced multiple linear regression model is derived for calculating the cell performance without having to solve the full physics-based model. The main finding is that the layer thickness of the hole and electron-transporting layers, and the hole mobility in the hole-transporting layer are the three most critical parameters influencing on the cell performance. When this result is applied to the world record perovskite solar cell of 23.2% efficiency with parameter cross-validation, it is predicted that this efficiency can be further improved by 1.8% to achieve 25%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据