4.8 Article

Power-to-gas management using robust optimisation in integrated energy systems

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 681-689

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.028

关键词

Integrated-energy system; Wind power; Hydrogen (H-2); Wobbe Index; Combustion Potential; Robust optimisation

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, United Kingdom [EP/M000141/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/M000141/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large volume of wind power is curtailed worldwide due to the intermittency and limited transportation capacity of electrical power systems. New technologies, Power-to-Gas via electrolysis, can convert excessive wind power into hydrogen to be transported by natural gas systems. However, the injection of H-2 into natural gas pipelines can cause gas quality issues due to changing gas compositions. This paper investigates the impact of injecting H-2 converted from wind power on natural gas quality. Two key indexes used to measure gas quality, Wobbe Index and Combustion Potential, are introduced to examine the impact. Then, in order to bring the two indexes into acceptable statutory ranges, H-2 is mixed with Liquid Petroleum Gas and Nitrogen. A robust optimization model, considering wind power uncertainties, is thereafter developed to manage the gas mixture, maximize H-2 injection. This paper uses the dynamic gas system model to represent real-time pipeline flows, which can better reflect gas flow features over time. The proposed method is demonstrated on a small integrated gas-electricity system. Results illustrate that excessive H-2 injection will reduce Wobbe Index but increase Combustion Potential. The robust optimization approach can effectively manage the mixture while ensuring gas quality with an uncertain wind power supply. The proposed method is beneficial to reducing renewable energy curtailment and maximizing H-2 injection, benefiting electricity system operators with low operation costs and wind power more penetration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据