4.8 Article

Parametric optimization of long-term multi-area heat and power production with power storage

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 802-812

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.015

关键词

Combined heat and power (CHP); Optimization; Power transmission; Power storage; Energy efficiency

资金

  1. STEEM - Sustainable Transition of European Energy Market by the Academy of Finland [298317]
  2. STORE - Stochastic Optimization of Renewable Energy in large polygeneration systems by the Academy of Finland [298317]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [298317, 298317] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper develops a model and optimization method for multi-area heat and power production with power transmission and storage. The objective function of the model is to minimize the operating costs of the system. The model can be used both for planning optimal system operation, and for simulating the effects of extended production, transmission and storage capacity. The proposed parametric decomposition method is fast enough to solve problems with a large number of hourly models. The parametric decomposition method works in two phases. First, the problem is decomposed into hourly local energy production models without storages and transmission. Parametric linear programming analysis is applied to these models for determining the optimal marginal operating costs as a function of power production. In the second phase, the optimal marginal cost functions are encoded as a linear transshipment network model including storages and transmission network. The network model is solved using generic sparse linear programming software. The operation of each production plant is determined based on the network solution. The decomposition method was validated by comparing it against an integrated linear programming model. The decomposition method demonstrates good accuracy and solves yearly models up to 30 times faster than the integrated model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据