4.8 Article

Novel key parameter for eutectic nitrates based nanofluids selection for concentrating solar power (CSP) systems

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 529-542

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.114

关键词

Heat transfer fluids; High temperature; Molten salt; Nanofluids; Specific heat; Rheological behaviour

资金

  1. Key Technologies program from State Grid Corporation of China
  2. Global Energy Interconnection Research Institute Europe GmbH [SGRI-DL-71-16-018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high-performance heat transfer fluid (HTF) plays a crucial role in the overall performance and efficiency of concentrating solar power (CSP) systems for utilizing solar energy. Molten salt-based nanofluids, which may offer a promising solution to help reduce the size and cost of CSP systems, have attracted increasing attention. However, there is still no comprehensive assessment strategy that considers the conflictive effects of adding nanoparticles in HTFs, such as the compromise between energy storage capacity increase and pumping cost increase. In this work, a methodology for nanofluids screening and selection is proposed and a novel parameter (R) is determined to assess the conflictive effect. The parameter (R) considers the ratio between the relative pumping power and the relative energy stored of the nanofluid compared to its base fluid. Three promising eutectics nitrate based nanofluids (NaNO3-KNO3, LiNO3-NaNO3-KNO3, LiNO3-NaNO3-KNO3-Ca(NO3)(2)) doped with 0.5 wt.% and 1 wt.% silica nanoparticles were selected and evaluated by the proposed methodology. As a result, adding nanoparticles into binary salts always present a negative effect (R = 1.03-1.22) when considering the ratio between the relative pumping cost and the relative energy stored. For ternary salt, adding 1 wt.% silica nanoparticles would be more preferable with a decrease of the parameter (R = 0.89-0.97, R < 1). In terms of quaternary, adding nanoparticles into quaternary does not change the parameter significantly (R = 0.96-1.04).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据