4.7 Article

Preparation of geopolymer inorganic membrane and purification of pulp-papermaking green liquor

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 269-275

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.11.024

关键词

Kaolin; Geopolymer; Sedimentation filtering; Inorganic membrane; Wastewater treatment; Green liquor

资金

  1. Chinese Natural Science Fund [21566006, 51668009]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Fund [2016GXNSFGA380003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes a low-cost and highly efficient metakaolin-based geopolymer composite membrane (support + dense layer) at normal pressure and < 70 degrees C. The support was fabricated using geopolymer foam materials and shows a large water flux and good mechanical properties. The dense layer was prepared using a dip-coating process with geopolymer paste on the porous geopolymer support surface. This study explored the influence of the foam agent content on the support membrane microstructure, water flux and compressive strength, and determined that the optimal foam agent content is 1.0 mass%. By adjusting the viscosity of the geopolymer paste in accordance with the water flux and removal rate, the thickness of the dense layer was determined as 500 mu m. The composite membrane shows a distribution of pore sizes (approximately 0.09 mu m of dense layer), amorphous structure, high permeable water flux (245 kg.m(-2).h(-1)), good interface combination and can be reused. The preliminary ultra-filtration test (0.2 MPa operation pressure) demonstrates that the geopolymer-based composite membrane can effectively treat suspended particles in wastewater and is expected to be applied in the field of wastewater treatment. We then used the composite membrane in the pulp-papermaking green liquor at different temperatures, and it was found that the SS (suspended solids) of the filtrate can be decreased to 3.45 mg/L at 80 degrees C or to 0.79 mg/L at 30 degrees C, far below the industrial requirements of green liquor recycling (SS < 20 mg.L-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据