4.8 Article

Enhanced ceria nanoflakes using graphene oxide as a sacrificial template for CO oxidation and dry reforming of methane

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 358-368

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.011

关键词

Ceria; Dry methane reforming; CO oxidation; Graphene oxide; Template

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/L016354/1, EP/R512904/1, EP/P008097/1, EP/L020432/2]
  2. EPSRC [EP/P008097/1, EP/L020432/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of novel fabrication methods to produce ceria catalysts with good high-temperature stability is critical for their implementation across a range of different applications. Herein, graphene oxide flakes are used as a sacrificial template in the synthesis of ceria particles to replicate the graphene oxide's two-dimensionality. While performing the synthesis without graphene oxide results in large agglomerations of ceria crystallites, the addition of graphene oxide during the synthesis results in ceria nanoflakes (< 10 nm) replicating the graphene oxide morphology. This novel shape limits the diffusion of atoms at high temperature to a two-dimensional plane which is translated into a low sintering degree and consequently, an enhanced thermal stability. In this way, the ceria flakes are capable of maintaining high surface areas after calcination at high temperatures (> 400 degrees C) which results in improved catalytic performance for the oxidation of carbon monoxide. This resistance versus sintering has also a beneficial effect when ceria flakes are used as catalytic support of nickel particles. Improved metal dispersion and high metal-support interaction leads to lower sintering during the dry reforming of methane than similarly prepared un-templated ceria nickel catalysts. These results demonstrate the advantage of using graphene oxide as a sacrificial template for the production of sintering-resistant catalysts with good catalytic performance at high temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据