4.8 Article

Construction of CDs/CdS photocatalysts for stable and efficient hydrogen production in water and seawater

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 178-185

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.096

关键词

Carbon dots/cadmium sulfide hybrid; Photocatalytic hydrogen production; Water and seawater; High efficiency and stability; Improved charge transport and separation

资金

  1. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51725204, 51572179, 21471106, 21771132, 21501126]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20161216]
  4. 111 Project
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalytic hydrogen production on semiconductors has been intensively researched in the past years, yet it still lacks research on efficient and stable photocatalysis in seawater. In this paper, with cadmium sulfide (CdS) as a sample photocatalyst and carbon dots (CDs) as cocatalyst, we fabricated a series of CDs/CdS composites serving as efficient hydrogen production photocatalysts in both water and seawater. In this case, the optimal CDs/CdS-S composites (nanosheet with cocatalyst content of 0.01 g(CDs)/g(catalyst) exhibit prominent H-2 production rate of 4.64 mmol h(-1) g(-1) (6.70 mmol h(-1) g(-1), water) and AQE of 11.8% (19.3%, water) under 420 nm light irradiation in seawater, which are about 265 and 169 (78 and 77, water) times of those of the non-modified irregular CdS in seawater, respectively. The excellent activity and stability are attributed to the competency of CDs that not only dramatically improves the charge separation efficiency, but also plays indispensable role in resisting the distraction from various ionic components in seawater. We hope our work can provide a feasible perspective for constructing high-efficient photocatalyst towards practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据