4.7 Article

NF-B contributes to Smac mimetic-conferred protection from tunicamycin-induced apoptosis

期刊

APOPTOSIS
卷 24, 期 3-4, 页码 269-277

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10495-018-1507-2

关键词

Apoptosis; Cell death; Smac; NF-B; Tunicamycin

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. BMBF
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [675448]
  4. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program [IUAP7/32]
  5. Belgian State, Science Policy Office

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Smac mimetics that deplete cellular inhibitor of apoptosis (cIAP) proteins have been shown to activate Nuclear Factor-kappa B (NF-B). Here, we report that Smac mimetic-mediated activation of NF-B contributes to the rescue of cancer cells from tunicamycin (TM)-triggered apoptosis. The prototypic Smac mimetic BV6 activates non-canonical and canonical NF-B pathways, while TM has little effect on NF-B signaling. Importantly, ectopic expression of dominant-negative IB superrepressor (IB-SR), which inhibits canonical and non-canonical NF-B activation, significantly reversed this BV6-imposed protection against TM. Similarly, transient or stable knockdown of NF-B-inducing kinase, which accumulated upon exposure to BV6 alone and in combination with TM, significantly counteracted BV6-mediated inhibition of TM-induced apoptosis. Interestingly, while cIAP2 was initially degraded upon BV6 treatment, it was subsequently upregulated in an NF-B-dependent manner, as this restoration of cIAP2 expression was abolished in IB-SR-overexpressing cells. Interestingly, upon exposure to TM/BV6 apoptosis was significantly increased in cIAP2 knockdown cells. Furthermore, NF-B inhibition partially prevented BV6-stimulated expression of Mcl-1 upon TM treatment. Consistently, Mcl-1 silencing significantly inhibited BV6-mediated protection from TM-induced apoptosis. Thus, NF-B activation by Smac mimetic contributes to Smac mimetic-mediated protection against TM-induced apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据